New hearing, before the Court of Assizes of Milan, for Alessandro Impagnatiello, accused of the multi-aggravated murder of his partner, Giulia Tramontano , and the child she was carrying, which occurred with 37 stab wounds in their home in Senago.
In addition to the examination of the former barman, who answers the questions of his lawyers - Giulia Geradini and Samanta Barbaglia - there are the testimonies of the psychiatrists for the defense consultancy from which it emerged that Impagnatiello suffers from "a complex disorder" with "narcissistic traits » and «obsessive compulsive».
The judges have ordered a psychiatric evaluation for the accused and will assign the assignment on June 27th.
«Being so superficial as to confess the parallel relationship to my pregnant partner was yet another symptom that my head was going crazy. I'm not saying I'm crazy, I hoped to believe it, I wanted to believe I was crazy. I don't think I'm crazy", said the accused when asked why, in December 2023, he had confessed to Giulia about the betrayal with a colleague at the Armani Cafè, and then decided to recant. «I told Giulia about the parallel relationship and - she said again - her reaction was negative. She was shaken that evening."
THE INCONSISTENCES – Discrepancies emerged between what Impagnatiello said in the courtroom and what appears from the investigation documents such as the forensic copies of his phone or the results of the autopsy. This is what emerges from some questions for clarifications posed to the barman by prosecutor Alessia Menegazzo. In particular, among the inconsistencies highlighted by the prosecution, one concerns the holiday in Ibiza with Giulia, a few weeks before killing her. The 31-year-old said he would forget about the other girl with whom he was in a parallel relationship to the point where he didn't even reply to the messages she sent him. «Are you sure about what you said? - asks the public prosecutor - Because the forensic copies tell something else. In three days we found over 500 exchanges of photos and messages." And he: "Yes, it's true, she wrote to me, she was looking for me, I was slow in replying to her, I had distanced myself very much from her." For example, "the photo of the sea, but it was a response to the ten, twenty messages he sent me, it was a tiny thing compared to our standards." Furthermore, from the autopsy examination, unlike what he stated at the last hearing, i.e. that when he stabbed Giulia she was crouching in front of a piece of furniture in the living room looking for a plaster due to a small wound, there was no cut on her hand: «No, he says, she had cut her finger, but not seriously", he replied to the prosecutor. Among the other inconsistencies highlighted by the Prosecutor's Office, also that regarding "a peaceful discussion" between him and Giulia, shortly before the murder. Version given at the last hearing by the man and which clashes with the "screams of a woman" heard by a neighbor summoned as a witness.
