The lawyers of Shmuel Peleg, Eitan Biran's maternal grandfather, will present an appeal next week against the sentence of the judge of the Tel Aviv Family Court who recognized the reasons of Aya Biran Nirko - the child's paternal aunt - based on the Convention Aja on the abduction of minors.

Peleg's lawyer Ronen Dlayahu said this in an interview on public radio Kan.

"The appeal - he explained - should be presented next week because times are tight according to the Hague convention". Dlayahu then criticized the trial chaired by Judge Iris Ilotovich Segal as "he focused only on the question of whether (Eitan, ed.) He was illegitimately taken, but did not discuss the child's good. Also within the framework of the convention of the child. 'Aja there are important arguments about protection (paragraph 13b), ie what harm could occur if it were brought back. "

In the opinion of the lawyer "this is a very particular case both in Israel and in the world in which a minor is not contending with parents, but members of the extended family".

Referring to the need for Eitan to find "peace and tranquility", the lawyer said that Peleg is looking for "solutions" but that "to dance the tango it takes two", alluding to Aya Biran's family. He then stressed that he disagreed with Judge Ilotovich Segal's ruling, which found Eitan's parents' willingness to return to Israel unproven.

"From the evidence produced - underlined the lawyer - they had an unequivocal intention to return to the country. The will, the intention of the parents was very significant: they saw this place as the center of their life".

SURVEILLANCE - Meanwhile, the Israeli court "at the request of Eitan's guardian, paternal aunt Aya," has accepted his concerns by ordering that a new agreement be negotiated that provides for third-party surveillance for Eitan's visits to the Peleg family. ", that is, that of maternal grandparents.

This was made clear by Aya's Italian lawyers, the lawyers Grazia Cesaro and Cristina Pagni.

"With respect to the accusations addressed to the paternal aunt of not respecting the alternation agreements in the custody of the minor - they then clarified - we specify that on October 27, 2021, the court in Israel, at the request of the guardian, accepted her concerns by ordering that negotiated a new agreement that provides for third-party surveillance for Eitan's visits to the Peleg family. "

According to what the Pelegs denounced to the Israeli Court, on the basis of the temporary agreement between the families reached in recent weeks, before the sentence on Monday, and which provided for an alternate stay of the child of three days between Aya and his grandfather Shmuel Peleg, the aunt he should have brought the baby back to his grandfather but he never did. The aunt would never even answer the phone and never took the child back to the Pelegs even though reminders had been issued. Aya herself, however, turned to the Court to clarify that she had chosen to keep her grandson with her, after the sentence, because she no longer trusts the Pelegs, after the little one was taken away by his grandfather from Pavia on the 11th. September, and especially in the absence of checks during the meetings.

(Unioneonline / vl)

© Riproduzione riservata