"We have studied laws and paragraphs. And for some oversight in English, are we out?".

The question is asked by the examiners, including Sardinians, rejected in the competition for judicial official in the courts, who complain of having been rejected not for the gaps in matters concerning justice and law, but for their knowledge of the English language, judged in many cases sufficient, but not adequate to the required standards.

And so many of those not admitted to the oral test have decided to resort to the TAR. Not only that, someone has also written the Minister of Justice Marta Cartabia.

"I - explains a candidate, in her report to the Keeper of Seals - I achieved a score much higher than the minimum but I was not admitted to the oral test, while many candidates with a score lower than mine, therefore presumably less prepared on the legal part, can continue in carrying out the oral exam ".

Seventeen appeals that from Sardinia are ready to end before the administrative court, collected by the lawyer Francesco Leone.

The contest under accusation is that of last October 13 to assign over 2,300 seats to the ministry. Many, as mentioned, also the candidates who presented themselves in Cagliari.

The examiners were asked 40 questions on law. But there were thresholds in computer science and in English with a minimum score of 3.5 out of 5.

And so there are those who took almost 27 (the minimum score was 21) but did not obtain the oral pass for having slipped into the English questions.

"In terms of public competitions, certain rules are needed - explains the lawyer Leone - It is unthinkable that each competition foresees different procedures. This, for example, provides for a triple threshold that is unique: it is neither provided for by the law. framework of public competitions nor by the Brunetta reform ".

According to the lawyer, the minimum score of 3.5 / 5 required for English and IT is "excessive".

"Although it is a mere suitability, the Ministry asked for a more than sufficient score, equal to 7/10 (in proportion). Instead - argues the lawyer - it had to be a simple 'assessment' of the knowledge of the English language and computer science that , in public competitions, are understood to be demonstrated with the possession of a certification, also obtained in annuity

previous. For this we will ask the judge to apply the minimum score of 3/5 (equal to 6/10) to our applicants ".

(Unioneonline / lf)

© Riproduzione riservata