La Russa recalls the birth of the MSI, the ANPI's attack: "Inconceivable and offensive."
The Senate President's reply: "The flame is in the symbol of FdI, the most voted party."Ignazio La Russa (ANSA/RICCARDO ANTIMIANI)
Per restare aggiornato entra nel nostro canale Whatsapp
Ignazio La Russa returns to his video in which he commemorated the birth of the MSI on December 26, 1946, 79 years ago, and in a post on social media, he jokes with those who have criticized, particularly his definition of the Flame as a "symbol of love."
That Flame, the Senate President emphasizes, is now on the emblem of the most voted party in Italy, the FdI, "with all due respect" to those who criticized it. The video, released Saturday morning, had been criticized by center-left parliamentarians, such as Democrats Federico Fornaro, Irene Manzi, Andrea De Maria, and Filiberto Zaratti of AVS.
Then it was the ANPI's turn: "It is inconceivable and offensive that the second highest office of the state is represented by someone who is unashamed to flaunt affectionate sympathy for the heirs of the fascist massacre ," said President Gianfranco Pagliarulo. Today, he commemorated the anniversary of the Cervi brothers' massacre, which occurred 82 years ago, as did Genoa Mayor Silvia Salis, Democratic Party Senator Valeria Fedeli, and numerous others on social media, as a counterpoint to La Russa's post. Late in the afternoon, the Senate President returned to his video, with his trademark irony, to "thank those who were alarmed, surprised, or even disgusted."
"They all confirmed their willful ignorance about postwar history, the role of the political right, and even the fact that the PCI leaders attended Giorgio Almirante's funeral, broadcast live by RAI." " But what's surprising," he continues, "is that those who were even "outraged" by the memory of the tricolor flame's relevance fail to realize that this is the symbol of the party most voted for by Italians today. With all due respect to those who preach the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution but would actually like to annul the freedom of civil expression of those who beat them at the polls and hold different views."
(Unioneonline)
