Garlasco, doubts about Andrea Sempio's receipt. He reiterates: "I took it."
The ticket that supposedly proved his presence in Vigevano when Chiara was killed was kept for a year and then handed over to investigators. Now a second witness, after the firefighter friend of his mother, says it wasn't his.Andrea Sempio (Ansa)
Per restare aggiornato entra nel nostro canale Whatsapp
A new witness emerges in the long judicial history of the murder of Chiara Poggi .
According to leaks and reports by some newspapers, someone, no one knows when, showed up at the fire station on Via Moscova to also dismantle Sempio's alibi (something already done by Antonio, the firefighter friend of Sempio's mother): the parking ticket in Vigevano, dated August 13, 2007, kept by Sempio and provided a year after the murder, is not his . The man allegedly said he knew for certain that the ticket was given to Sempio by someone else . Therefore, it was not him, on the morning of August 13, 2007 at 10:18, who collected the one-euro ticket from the parking meter that was supposed to prove his presence in the city and not in Garlasco.
Sempio, even today, reiterated that he had taken the receipt. "Yes, of course," he said in an interview with "Who Has Seen It?" "It would have been better if it had aroused suspicion at the time, so that the authorities would have searched the security cameras in Vigevano's main square to see if there was any footage of me that morning. Perhaps," added the 37-year-old, now under investigation for the murder that occurred on August 13, 2007, "it would have been better for me if it had aroused more interest at the time. Besides, they asked me for the receipt a year later, and the video was gone."
"Even if it were an alibi, it's a mere clue and not evidence," his lawyer Liborio Cataliotti explained today. "So what evidentiary value do we want to give to all this hullabaloo? At best, from the prosecution's point of view, very little. " The lawyer, who along with Angela Taccia is assisting Sempio, then added: "Experience teaches me that sometimes, when confidential information leaks out into the media," this "is a choice made by those who have access to the classified document to gauge reactions, which are not there here."
(Unioneonline)
