21 declarations of illegality, 13 of unfoundedness, 3 of inadmissibility. These are the findings by the Constitutional Court on the House Plan of Sardinia that the Government challenged in March last year. The sentence was filed yesterday. As many as 27 of the 31 articles of the regional law were contested.

In general, the Government's complaints on the extension of the Housing Plan were shared because "it is precisely the indefinite succession of extensions, anchored to the entry into force of a new regional law on the governance of the territory or to terms deferred from time to time, which interferes with landscape protection and determines the vulnus reported by the applicant ". Furthermore, "the regional law, allowing parceled interventions, released from a coherent and stable reference regulatory framework, neglects the interest in orderly building development, typical of urban planning, and thus damages the territory in all its related components and, primarily, in its landscape and environmental aspect ".

Secondly, the Council rejects all the rules that derogate from the regional landscape plan, which cannot be derogated from without a State-Region co-planning. According to the judges, in some cases the rejected rules do not "bring any derogation from the PPR". Hence the non-validity and inadmissibility of the complaints corresponding to the latter.

(Unioneonline / ss)

© Riproduzione riservata