While the Pavia Public Prosecutor's Office awaits the summons of those who, 19 years ago, worked on the investigation into Chiara Poggi's murder, a new chapter emerges, once again concerning the work of former RIS investigators. At first glance, this seems to cast further shadows on the investigation at the time. This further paves the way for a request to review Alberto Stasi's 16-year sentence. With the recent closure of the investigation, in which Pavia prosecutors are pointing the finger at Andrea Sempio and revisiting the case in an attempt to exonerate Stasi, a collateral effect of the recent investigations conducted by the Carabinieri on behalf of prosecutors led by Fabio Napoleone is emerging. These effects are drawing in former investigators and consultants, sidelining the 38-year-old clerk, against whom a request for indictment is looming.

After the DNA-on-pedals case, with two null results never filed at the time, a mysterious report has emerged, discovered among the documentation acquired on September 10th at the RIS laboratories in Parma, on the personality of the former Bocconi student. The report, bearing the letterhead, address, and email address of psychologist and criminologist Alessandra Bramante, condenses into 13 pages aspects of the then-investigated man's character, as well as investigative comments and considerations on his statements. It appears that it was never requested by prosecutor Rosa Muscio, then serving in Vigevano, nor was it ever submitted to the parties . "I have never created any profile. If I write reports, I date and sign them," the person directly involved stated, explaining in a statement that she had never had any dealings with Stasi, adding that she would never have written such a report on headed paper without signing it. That document contains three columns containing entire passages of Stasi's statements in three reports, which he made between August 13 and 22, 2007, to prosecutor Muscio, who will be among the witnesses shortly summoned by the Pavia investigators.

Based on the interviews conducted by Chiara's boyfriend the day after the crime, observations and comments were recorded in black and white, then catalogued into 17 points to describe some of her character traits: "Narcissistic tendencies," "ambivalence and contradictions regarding sex," "coldness," "calculating," "absolute lack of emotion (positive or negative)," "extreme indifference toward the victim." These comments also included considerations such as: "Some sentences are reported mechanically, as if they were memorized," or "Chiara is never thought of... as if she had never been his girlfriend (so much so that he tells emergency responders that a dead girl is there)."

"It could be an initiative by the judicial police," commented Dario Redaelli, an expert on the Poggi team of consultants, "whose findings were not formally reported to the public prosecutor because they were deemed irrelevant. Furthermore, it seems far-fetched to say that this is where the label," the one that made headlines, "of the 'blonde with the ice-cold eyes,' comes from, especially since that document has never been made public."

Carabinieri Commander Salvatore Luongo also commented on the case, which will certainly be included in one of the new separate files: "If the judiciary finds irregularities or individual responsibilities in the past, the force's response will be one of full cooperation, maximum transparency, and absolute firmness." Meanwhile, Stasi's defense is taking longer to file a motion for a review, as evidence continues to emerge from prosecutors' documents in favor of the 43-year-old and concerning alleged irregularities in the past investigation. Furthermore, there is "new evidence" gathered by the same lawyers Bocellari and De Rensis, including one that "will make waves"—it appears to be a new testimony.

(Unioneonline)

© Riproduzione riservata