Draghi: “We don't like the 110% super bonus, tripled building prices”. The wrath of the 5 Star Movement
New clash between the premier and M5S, the superbonus has the hours numbered?
Does the 110% super bonus have the hours counted? Mario Draghi speaking in Brussels today made it clear that the government "does not like" the measure.
“Our government - in the words of the Prime Minister - was born as an ecological government, it makes the climate and the digital transition its most important pillars. But we do not agree on everything, on the 110% bonus, for example, we are not, because the cost of improving efficiency has more than tripled and the price of investments to implement the renovations has tripled, as the superbonus removes the price negotiation. ".
The speech is very clear: since the citizen does not pay substantially, he has no interest in negotiating on the price. And Pantalone pays, at least this is the opinion of Mario Draghi who did not blow the bonus so as not to lose the support of the 5 Star Movement but set several stakes and, with the end of the term approaching, could decide to force the but no.
“The Minister of the Environment - added the premier - was extraordinary, he made extraordinary measures. We may not agree on the superbonus and we are not, I cite an example: the cost of efficiency has more than tripled thanks to the 110% measures, the prices of the investments necessary for the restructuring have more than tripled because 110% of per itself removes the incentive to negotiate on the price. Then, things go on in Parliament, the government has done what it could and our minister is very good ".
IRA M5S - Immediate reply of the 5 Star Movement in a note: " Draghi threw the mask , perhaps at the base of the continuous regulatory stakes and the obsessive desire of the executive to want to limit the circulation of tax credits, there is precisely this intolerance against the provision ".
The 5 Stars remind us that the bonus “in 2021 contributed decisively to the + 6.6% of GDP which the prime minister benefited from . The incidence has been confirmed by dozens of analyzes and studies, which have led European commissioners such as Timmermans and Simson to highlight its innovative significance. In short, while Europe applauds and looks with curiosity at the positive effects of this facilitation, our prime minister resoundingly rejects it in Strasbourg: an evident contradiction ”.
Still. The premier's words are “a resounding slap in the face of the majority who support him, given that the 110% Superbonus was born thanks to the intuition of the M5s but now finds the undisputed favor of the whole Parliament . For a reason: this fiscal mechanism has not only resulted in energy savings equal to that of the electricity consumption of one million and 100 thousand households in twelve months, but has had saving effects on construction, with employment consequences unthinkable before it arrived. the ok to measure ".
Finally, “we would like to remind Draghi that the cost escalation in the construction sector has occurred throughout Europe, even in those countries that do not have building bonuses. So talking about energy efficiency improvements with tripled costs leaves the time it finds, a bit like at the beginning of the year when the finger was pointed at the boom in fraud related to the Superbonus, a boom that later turned out to be a false historical ”.
(Unioneonline / L)
