The Via Ghibli mystery sparks a clash over the investigating judge's report: Claudio Gulisano's defense finds it "inadmissible."
The preliminary hearing took place today after experts overturned the prosecution's theory: the spouses were not poisoned, but one suffocated and the other strangled. And the legal battle is ongoing.The two victims
Per restare aggiornato entra nel nostro canale Whatsapp
There is a clash over the expert report of the consultants appointed by the Cagliari investigating judge Ermengarda Ferrarese to shed light on the double homicide of Luigi Gulisano and Marisa Dessì , the 79 and 82 year old spouses found dead in their home on Via Ghibli on 5 December 2024.
According to the experts, who overturned the poisoning hypothesis put forward by the Prosecutor's Office, one of the two was strangled with a pillow or scarf, the other suffocated . At different times, but always on the same day.
Today, during the preliminary hearing in court, lawyer Luigi Sanna, representing Claudio Gulisano, 44, the only suspect under investigation for voluntary manslaughter and currently in prison, raised the question of the inadmissibility of the expert report . According to the lawyer, the consultants used evidence in their analyses that was not included in the investigation.
The decision on the admissibility of the expert report will be made on September 18th . This afternoon, lawyer Gianluca Aste, who represents the couple's other son as the injured party, was also present in court.
This distortion of the murder's details could be a weapon for the defense, which aims to highlight alleged inconsistencies in the investigation. Regardless of the circumstances of the crime, the prosecution will continue its investigation, confident that the perpetrator is the couple's youngest son. According to prosecutors, the motive is financial: Claudio Gulisano killed his parents to inherit some property the couple owned in the city .
The money would have been used to solve the financial problems caused by the failure of a market that his father had given him as a gift.
The serious evidence against him: the transfer of money (around 20 thousand euros) from the parents' accounts to that of their son, on the day of the crime and the following day, and a video that would portray him in a place that does not correspond to his alibi .
(Unioneonline)