Sardinia between the principle of insularity, specialty and differentiated autonomy
A "principle" of a general nature and not a detailed, precise and binding regulation of implementation contentsHaving concluded the work in the Commission on autonomy, the general discussion should begin today. It seems like we need to take note of this. Yet, on the pure and simple opportunity of offering the impetus for the most rapid definition of the Calderoli Reform on Differentiated Autonomy for the Regions with Ordinary Statute, one could, perhaps, argue at length in consideration of the imposing legal, administrative and, last but not least, of a human nature, linked to its implementation especially in reference to the so-called Insular Regions, such as Sardinia.
Remembering what was the excursus of the procedure that led to the modification of article 119 of the Constitution, it is worth remembering that the European Parliament, only on 4 February 2016, resolved itself in the sense of approving a Resolution with which had formally recognized the insular status of Sicily and Sardinia. And considered in and of itself, the circumstance, also in consideration of its, so to speak, European character, had seemed, and would seem, to be anything but of little consequence.
First of all, because through such recognition the aim was to obtain simplified access, so to speak, to the cohesion programs defined pursuant to Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Therefore, why, at that moment, i.e. in the year 2016, the Italian Constitution did not contain any explicit reference to the so-called principle of insularity, rather speaking only in terms of the specialty with reference to Sicily and Sardinia. Finally, because the reference Constitutional Law concluded its process only on 28 July 2022 with the title indicated below: "Amendment to Article 119 of the Constitution, concerning the recognition of the peculiarities of the Islands and the overcoming of the disadvantages deriving from insularity ”. So no question. If only it weren't that to this day, despite the recognition that has taken place, it still remains to be clarified whether, in concrete terms, the formal goal achieved in national internal law can contribute to some extent to making the use of the Union's economic resources more agile. European Union and, again, in what way (provided it is compatible), to what extent, and on the basis of which parameters, the recognition in domestic law of the principle of "insularity" can coincide (and it does not appear to) with the interest pursued by the Reform Calderoli.
Saying it differently: if it is true that the constitutional appeal expressed by the condition of insularity presents itself in all its relevance, however, it appears equally true, as observed by many, that what has been introduced appears to be solely a "principle" of order general and not a detailed, precise and binding regulation of implementation contents. A circumstance that makes it very difficult to appreciate in practical administrative terms the methods of defining the disadvantages linked to the insular condition and their specific costs in the transport sector first and foremost, also in consideration of the fact that, at present, the so-called insular issue appears in its internal connotation alone. It follows that the effective implementation of the Calderoli Reform would end up worsening the legal-administrative position of the Islands, in this case Sardinia, which, beyond and beyond the contents of a Reform, the Calderoli one being understood, which would have needed to be preceded by a Referendum, would end up seeing the achievement of the pre-eminent objective towards which the regulatory recognition of insularity was intended to aspire weaken, that is, the social rebalancing tending towards the appreciation of the specificities and the fair and equitable distribution of the resources available for the overcoming all inequalities and the full implementation of fundamental rights. Unity in diversity. This should be the categorical imperative. And in this situation and on these assumptions, the practical-legal opportunity of a reform that would end up undermining the unity of the country of Italy should be considered.
Giuseppina Di Salvatore
(Lawyer – Nuoro)