The magistrate who wants to reopen the case of the Erba massacre is under accusation
Disciplinary proceedings for Cuno Tarfusser: "He violated the duties of correctness, confidentiality and balance"Per restare aggiornato entra nel nostro canale Whatsapp
Disciplinary proceedings against Cuno Tarfusser following the complaint by a manager of the Milan Attorney General's Office for a conflict that arose with the magistrate who considers the life imprisonment inflicted on the spouses Olindo Romano and Rosa Bazzi for the Erba massacre to be a judicial error.
The Corriere della Sera reports it: the competent Attorney General of the Cassation has started the disciplinary procedure not for the validity or otherwise of the questioning of the life sentences, but for the way of doing it. Tarfusser is accused (in the wake of what his boss Francesca Nanni complained about) of having "violated the duties of correctness, reserve and balance" when on 31 March he deposited the request for revision of the final sentence of the two life sentences to the chancellery on his own initiative , "in clear violation of the organizational document of the office which assigns to the advocate general and the attorney general" (who has the last word in the event of dissent) "the power to request the revision of sentences" if new evidence of innocence.
Tarfusser, the substitute police officer from Milan, is disciplinarily accused of having, precisely without any delegation from the boss, kept in contact for months with the defenders Fabio Schembri and Paolo Sevesi, and received scientific advice from them on the alleged new evidence in favor of the Romano-Bazzi spouses: on that base Tarfusser then wrote and filed with Nanni (for subsequent forwarding to the Court of Appeal of Brescia which has not occurred so far) a request for revision of the life sentences inflicted on the couple for the quadruple murder in 2006 .
Tarfusser was interrogated in Rome in the disciplinary by the substitute pg of Cassation Simone Perelli, in front of which he decided to claim his own impartiality in ascertaining also possible circumstances in favor of the defendants, and the absurdity in his opinion to make it depend on the interpretation of an internal regulation the fate of the two life prisoners he deems innocent .
(Unioneonline/D)