Nobody is able to know what the outcome of the vote of 25 September will be, especially after the hurricane that hit and overwhelmed the country's government both on the political side strictly understood, and on the side of internal and external balances to the parties.
But then, if this is the case, as it seems to be, the various polls that dominate the web and that animate the various national "talk shows" of reference , what credibility can they ever acquire even just in relation to the composition and institutional profile of the ruling class that it will come? What would be the benchmarks to establish, in a forecasting manner, the results of the next very close polls? Perhaps the contents of the respective election campaigns? Or perhaps the adversary's delegitimization carried out on a personal level but in any case extemporaneous with respect to the present context?
Someone, perhaps, seems to have missed a detail or, more likely, considers it appropriate to ignore it for convenience and a lack of responsibility. An electoral campaign that you want to consider as such should find its roots and foundation in the "works" and not in pure and simple "talk" from a "radical chic" lounge when not from "occasional meeting" that would seem to have been extrapolated, albeit in a summary way, from mysterious "dream books" declined, all of them, without exception, in a "futuristic" prediction but that nothing would seem able to tell, or rather, to determine, in the contingent situation.
All the aspiring parliamentarians, from right to left, passing through the center still to be defined, seem to offer themselves to the public of potential voters brandishing "solution recipes" that seem to have elevated the naturalistic obviousness to a system paradigm, to an indisputable dogma just to succeed to offer a renewed, but still decadent, image of himself and his group of "followers". But did "these" understand that at this moment, and from now on, it will be only that strange thing, called " competence ", to represent the ?
