The Committees mobilize: «Stop the wind turbines, justice for Saccargia»
Requested the annulment in self-protection of the environmental compatibility judgment and subsequent positive opinions in favor of the Erg project: «Ready to turn to the judiciary»A moment from this morning's meeting in Saccargia
Per restare aggiornato entra nel nostro canale Whatsapp
«Justice for Saccargia» . The committees of Gallura, Nurra and Sarcidano have submitted to the Ministry of the Environment, the Presidency of the Council and for information to the Region a request for annulment in self-protection of the environmental compatibility judgment and subsequent positive opinions in favor of the project for “Enhancement of the Nulvi Ploaghe wind farm with a total power of 121.5 Mw” presented on 27 November 2018 by the company ERG Wind Sardegna Srl . A project that risks surrounding the basilica with enormous wind turbines.
"The cancellation in self-regulation serves to guarantee the legality of administrative acts ," says Maria Grazia Demontis, spokesperson for the Gallura Committee. "It allows the public administration to eliminate its own illegitimate act, therefore, to correct its own mistakes." This morning, at the foot of the Basilica of Saccargia, activists presented this initiative: "Sardinian parliamentarians must remember why they are in Rome," he argues. " We would like our representatives to present an urgent question, asking that the energy transition be carried out legally ," is the appeal of Emilio Demuro, of the Sarcidano committee.
The activists guarantee: «The one against Erg is only the first of a long series of complaints» , is the conclusion. «The unreliability of the anemological reports is, in fact, a consolidated practice in the wind projects presented in Sardinia. We are continuously highlighting to the relevant ministries, through observations on the projects, all the critical issues of merit and, if, as in the case of Saccargia, the authorization process advances, regardless of the irregularities reported , our interlocutor can only and exclusively be the judiciary ».