It would bring to mind Brecht in "We sat on the wrong side because all the other seats were taken," if it weren't for the fact that the other was a German Marxist and the other is a Don Camillo-leaning Emilian. A former DC member in '69, a Catholic city councilor in the red-dominated Modena, a regional councilor, and then a member of parliament, undersecretary, minister, and senator, Carlo Giovanardi, 76, hasn't been in Parliament for eight years in a bipolar Italy, always center-right and almost always in parties with D and C in their acronym (CCD, UDC, PDL, NCD). Perhaps it's because politics has become more tense in the meantime, but even those who disagree with him on everything can think that in the Third Republic, fading into the Fourth, there would be room for his ability to embrace the most scathing theses without sacrificing his bonhomie, at the very least.
Carlo Giovanardi, what are you doing?
"Shall we talk about this morning? I'm working on a conference we're holding in Fiumicino to debunk all the lies that continue to circulate about Ustica."
What lies?
"The cosmic lie about the air battle, when it's now clear that the plane was blown up by a bomb planted on board. They're the same people who attacked Fiumicino in '73 and '85, the extremist wing of the PLO."
There is a procedural truth.
"The generals' acquittal clearly states that the air battle is a science fiction scenario. But the trial to find those responsible is still ongoing: we opposed the dismissal, and our objection was upheld."
By “us” who do you mean?
The Association for the Truth about Ustica. It is chaired by Mrs. Cavazza, who lost her mother in the disaster, and is made up of retired Air Force leaders: pilots, test pilots, and the most prominent names in Italian aviation expertise.
Amato asked Macron to acknowledge that the plane was shot down by a French fighter jet.
Amato and I have an excellent relationship: he was my professor and once gave me top marks, then we were colleagues for years in Parliament. Two months ago I met him in Modena and said to him: “Giuliano, do you want to end up in the grotesque? At the trial against the generals you declared that once the wreckage was recovered it would be clear what had happened. And in fact, with the wreckage, the greatest experts in the world confirmed that it was a bomb. And you start talking about the French, the Americans? You even mentioned the Israelis... Do you realize?” And he said: “No, they misunderstood me, it was the newspapers that distorted my statements!” So much so that Amato, at Bonfietti's latest initiative, sent a message saying: “My hope is that the truth is finally discovered.” No more “French” or “Israeli”: the truth. "Look, the judges, in their acquittal of the generals, wrote that that evening there was no plane in the vicinity of that DC-9, neither Italian nor French. At the same time, there was one over Liguria—I know this because as a minister, I reported to Parliament on Ustica—and another in that area, but half an hour later. In short, we want the gentlemen who planted the bomb to be brought to justice, as they were in Lockerbie. Because if the perpetrators were thirty years old back then, now they're seventy and can still be found and arrested, instead of chasing ghosts."











